<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>National Security Agency: News &amp; Videos about National Security Agency - CNN.com</title><link>http://topics.cnn.com/topics/feeds/rss/National_Security_Agency</link><description>Find stories, videos, and photos about National Security Agency from CNN.com.</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Cable News Network LP, LLLP.</copyright><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 05:14:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>5</ttl><item><title>Congresswoman calls alleged wiretap 'abuse of power'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/21/harman.wiretap/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/21/harman.wiretap/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>A key Democrat who reportedly was overheard on a National Security Agency wiretap discussing a deal with a suspected Israeli agent has called the wiretap an "abuse of power."</description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 23:41:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Intelligence chief adds safeguards after wrongful intercepts</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/government.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/government.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>U.S. intelligence officials said Thursday that they have added safeguards to prevent the government from unlawfully spying on U.S. citizens after a routine check of the system "detected issues that raised concerns."</description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 19:56:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Economic downturn a gift for dance hall's polka fans </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/03/16/blobs.park.lives.again/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/03/16/blobs.park.lives.again/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The beer is flowing, the polka band is playing, and dancers are twirling across the dance floor.</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 15:52:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>When the State Police Fingers Terrorists</title><link>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1850692,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</link><guid>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1850692,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</guid><description>After Abu Ghraib and domestic eavesdropping, it takes a particularly brazen abuse of power to shock most Americans weary from eight years of the Bush Administration's war on terror</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:00:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Report: U.S. spied on Americans' intimate conversations abroad</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/09/spying.on.americans/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/10/09/spying.on.americans/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>Congress is looking into allegations that National Security Agency linguists have been eavesdropping on Americans abroad.</description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:59:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate sends no-warrant wiretapping bill to Bush</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/09/senate.fisa/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/09/senate.fisa/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Senate Wednesday approved a bill to put new rules in place for intelligence agency eavesdropping on suspected terrorists.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:24:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate OKs bill updating spying rules</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/09/news/companies/phone_spying/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/09/news/companies/phone_spying/index.htm</guid><description>The Senate Wednesday approved a bill to put new rules in place for intelligence agency eavesdropping on suspected terrorists.</description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:53:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>High court stays out of NSA surveillance row</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/19/scotus.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/19/scotus.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Supreme Court offered no explanation Tuesday for refusing to hear an appeal regarding the Bush administration's covert domestic surveillance program. </description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:10:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate OKs immunity for telecoms in intelligence bill</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/12/fisa.senate/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/12/fisa.senate/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Senate voted Tuesday to give immunity to telecommunications companies that helped the federal government eavesdrop on suspected terrorists after the September 11 attacks. </description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:51:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Dial 's' for secure</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/12/10/101644384/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/12/10/101644384/index.htm</guid><description>This is the smartphone the well-dressed soldier, spy, and homeland-security agent will be wearing on his or her utility belt starting next year. Built by General Dynamics to specs set by the hyperparanoid National Security Agency, the Sectera Edge is designed to give field agents a gateway to the classified world - plus everything they've come to expect on a PDA, including MP3 music files.</description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Committee passes surveillance laws update in face of veto threat</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/15/fisa.senate/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/15/fisa.senate/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday passed on a strict party-line vote an update to the nation's electronic surveillance laws despite a veto threat from the attorney general.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Justice Department to re-open no-warrant wiretap probe</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/domestic.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/13/domestic.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Bush administration has apparently changed policy and cleared the way for the Justice Department to restart an investigation into the government's no-warrant electronic surveillance program, a department official told Congress on Tuesday.</description><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:41:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Telecoms that helped warrantless spying could get off the hook</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/19/senate.surveillance/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/19/senate.surveillance/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>A bill that would grant immunity to telecommunications companies helping out in a no-warrant eavesdropping program authorized by President Bush and reinstate some court oversight to surveillance was OK'd by a Senate panel Thursday.</description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:27:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Verizon offers details on records releases</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/16/verizon.records/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/16/verizon.records/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>Verizon Communications says it has provided federal, state and local law enforcement agencies tens of thousands of communication and business records relating to customers based on emergency requests without a court order or administrative subpoena.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:14:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>How Washington Missed 9/11</title><link>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1655995,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</link><guid>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1655995,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</guid><description>The CIA's declassified report, says Robert Baer, shows that the attack could have been prevented if the various intel agencies were able to talk to each other</description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:00:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Dems continue executive privilege fight into recess</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/09/democrats.subpoenas.ap/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/09/democrats.subpoenas.ap/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>Though Congress is on vacation, majority Democrats are keeping alive various fights with the White House with one common thread: Congress' access to administration documents and testimony to which President Bush has claimed executive privilege.</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:55:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gonzales to senators: 'I may have created confusion'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/01/congress.surveillance/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/01/congress.surveillance/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>With potential perjury accusations hanging over him, embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales sent a letter to Senate leaders Wednesday acknowledging he "may have created confusion" in his previous testimony.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:01:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Gonzales calls it confusion; Specter calls it 'misleading'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/02/gonzales.congress/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/02/gonzales.congress/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee said he's not satisfied with Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' attempt to clarify his testimony about no-warrant surveillance.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:27:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Spy chief: Anti-terrorist programs more extensive than acknowledged</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/31/congress.gonzales/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/31/congress.gonzales/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Bush administration's anti-terrorist surveillance efforts are more extensive than top officials have acknowledged, going beyond the controversial no-warrant eavesdropping program, the U.S. intelligence chief said Tuesday.</description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:53:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Former U.S. official: Gonzales 'splitting hairs' in testimony</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/29/gonzales.surveillance/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/29/gonzales.surveillance/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>A dispute within the Bush administration in 2004 over a secret surveillance program centered on data mining, not eavesdropping, a former government official told CNN Sunday.</description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:17:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>FBI director appears to contradict Gonzales' testimony</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/26/gonzales.testimony/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/26/gonzales.testimony/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>FBI Director Robert Mueller told Congress Thursday that the confrontation between then-White House Counsel Alberto Gonzales and then-Attorney General John Ashcroft in Ashcroft's hospital room in 2004 concerned a controversial surveillance program -- an apparent contradiction of Senate testimony given Tuesday by Gonzales.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:31:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Snow: Congress creating 'controversies' over Gonzales</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/27/gonzales/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/27/gonzales/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The White House and Justice Department say what looks like a contradiction between testimony of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller is nothing more than a confusion of terms.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:08:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Court dismisses suit challenging domestic spying </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/06/court.domestic.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/06/court.domestic.spying/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>A federal appeals court Friday ordered the dismissal of an ACLU lawsuit challenging President Bush's domestic surveillance program. </description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 06:05:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is Assassination Allowed or Not? </title><link>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1634284,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</link><guid>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1634284,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</guid><description>We're finally getting around to rewriting the rules on what our intelligence agencies can and can't do. Better late than never, says Robert Baer</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 01:00:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Intelligence agencies to face 'cleanup agenda'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/23/senate.intelligence/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/23/senate.intelligence/index.html</guid><description>The incoming chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee says he will have a "cleanup agenda" ready when Democrats take power in January.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush confident about appeal on wiretap ruling</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/18/bush/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/08/18/bush/index.html</guid><description>President Bush said Friday he expects his administration will win its appeal of a judicial ruling finding the National Security Agency's warrantless domestic surveillance program unconstitutional.</description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:19:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Specter: Deal reached with White House on wiretaps</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/13/nsawiretaps.bill/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/13/nsawiretaps.bill/index.html</guid><description>The top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee said Thursday that he had struck a deal with the White House to resolve a dispute over the constitutionality of conducting electronic surveillance with court approval.</description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:32:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Paper backs off Verizon, BellSouth story</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/30/news/companies/nsa_database/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/30/news/companies/nsa_database/index.htm</guid><description>USA Today reported Friday that lawmakers confirmed the existence of the National Security Agency's program of collecting phone records, but the paper said it could not verify whether telecom firms Verizon and BellSouth provided phone records to the government agency.</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 14:51:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>AT&amp;amp;T overhauls privacy policy</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/22/news/companies/att_privacy/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/22/news/companies/att_privacy/index.htm</guid><description>Phone service provider AT&amp;amp;T announced Thursday a privacy policy overhaul that removes a key reference from its previous policy, which had said the company "does not access, read, upload or store data contained in or derived from private files without the members' authorization..."</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:26:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Specter maintains threat of subpoenas</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/11/nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/11/nsa/index.html</guid><description>The Republican chairman of a Senate committee said Sunday he is prepared to call telephone company officials to testify about a domestic wiretapping program if he doesn't get cooperation in talks with the Bush administration.</description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 18:48:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Specter warns of 'confrontation' over NSA hearings</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/07/nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/07/nsa/index.html</guid><description>A Senate committee chairman warned of a "constitutional confrontation" with the Bush administration Wednesday over its domestic surveillance program, threatening to subpoena administration officials or phone company executives in a congressional review.</description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 22:56:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Telecom execs won't testify on taps</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/06/news/companies/telco_nsa/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/06/06/news/companies/telco_nsa/index.htm</guid><description>Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter reversed course Tuesday, announcing he will not call on phone company executives to testify on their cooperation with the government in a secret eavesdropping program run by the National Security Agency.</description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 02:36:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Feds put squeeze on Internet firms</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/05/30/internet.records/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/internet/05/30/internet.records/index.html</guid><description>The attorney general and the FBI director have asked the nation's leading Internet service companies to keep a variety of customer information and other data for two years, much longer than the companies do now, the Justice Department confirmed Tuesday.</description><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 19:44:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Sources: NSA leak probe includes Congress</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/25/fbi.nsa.leak/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/25/fbi.nsa.leak/index.html</guid><description>The FBI wants to interview top members of Congress from both parties about the leak to The New York Times concerning the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program, sources told CNN.</description><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 17:17:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hayden nomination moves to full Senate</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/23/hayden/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/23/hayden/index.html</guid><description>The Senate Intelligence Committee voted 12-3 Tuesday in favor of Gen. Michael Hayden to lead the Central Intelligence Agency, sending  his nomination to the floor for a vote by the full Senate.</description><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 19:30:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>BellSouth seeks retraction on phone story</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/18/news/companies/bell_south/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/18/news/companies/bell_south/index.htm</guid><description>Telecommunications giant BellSouth has sent a letter to USA Today asking for a retraction of a story the paper ran last week alleging the company and two others were cooperating with a National Security Agency program to compile a massive database of domestic phone calls.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 21:03:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>BellSouth to USA Today: NSA story is bogus</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/18/bellsouth.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/18/bellsouth.nsa/index.html</guid><description>BellSouth is demanding that the newspaper that said it provided private phone records to the National Security Agency retract its article.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 20:59:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Poll: 26% suspect they've been wiretapped</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/18/nsa.poll/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/18/nsa.poll/index.html</guid><description>One in four Americans think it is likely that the government has listened to their phone calls, according to a CNN poll conducted by Opinion Research Corporation.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 15:45:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>CIA pick promises to revamp agency</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/18/hayden.hearing/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/18/hayden.hearing/index.html</guid><description>Gen. Michael Hayden told senators Thursday that he would determine what the American public needs to know and what will remain secret if he is confirmed to take the reins of the embattled Central Intelligence Agency.</description><pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 08:14:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Judge: AT&amp;amp;T docs can be used in wiretap suit</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/17/news/companies/att/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/17/news/companies/att/index.htm</guid><description>The judge hearing a case challenging the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program said Wednesday that the plaintiffs may keep documents AT&amp;amp;T says contain proprietary information for use in preparing their case, but the documents must remain under seal.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 20:36:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>White House to brief House, Senate panels on NSA wiretaps</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/17/nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/17/nsa/index.html</guid><description>Details of a classified government wiretap program will be given to full congressional committees for the first time on Wednesday, senior politicians said.</description><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 12:19:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>BellSouth, AT&amp;amp;T added to NSA lawsuit</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/16/NSA.suit/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/16/NSA.suit/index.html</guid><description>BellSouth and AT&amp;amp;T were added to a class-action lawsuit against Verizon Communications that alleges the companies illegally participated in a National Security Agency domestic surveillance program.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 23:08:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Read Verizon's statement</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/16/news/companies/verizon_statement/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/16/news/companies/verizon_statement/index.htm</guid><description>Verizon Communications Inc. denied Tuesday reports that it provided the National Security Agency with customer phone records. The company's full statement follows:</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 21:01:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Verizon denies giving out phone info</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/16/news/companies/verizon/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/16/news/companies/verizon/index.htm</guid><description>Verizon Communications Inc. denied earlier media reports that it entered into a contract with the National Security Agency, providing the government office with info about its customer phone calls.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 20:33:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>BellSouth denies giving records to NSA</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/15/bellsouth.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/15/bellsouth.nsa/index.html</guid><description>Despite media reports to the contrary, BellSouth said late Monday it had not participated in any effort by the National Security Agency to collect customer phone records.</description><pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 01:59:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Verizon stock takes hit on $50 billion lawsuit</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/15/news/companies/verizon/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/15/news/companies/verizon/index.htm</guid><description>A lawsuit is asking a federal court to order President Bush, the National Security Agency and Verizon to end a secret snooping program, and Verizon's stock took a hit on the news Monday.</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 14:56:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Inside Bush's secret spy net</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/14/coverstory.tm/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/14/coverstory.tm/index.html</guid><description>Around the White House, an abrupt change in the president's public schedule is known as an "audible," and generally, it's the last thing anyone wants to suggest to a boss so allergic to disruption that he makes everyone turn off their cell phones when he's in the room.</description><pubDate>Sun, 14 May 2006 10:45:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Telecoms named in NSA story say they guard privacy</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/12/phone.records/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/12/phone.records/index.html</guid><description>Verizon Communications on Friday would neither confirm nor deny whether it has provided domestic telephone records to the National Security Agency, but the company insisted it protects customer privacy and would never participate in a government "fishing expedition."</description><pubDate>Sat, 13 May 2006 00:56:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Your call: Should the NSA look at phone records?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/12/feedback.phone.records/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/12/feedback.phone.records/index.html</guid><description>The National Security Agency has been collecting information on millions of domestic phone calls, according to a report this week in USA Today. CNN.com asked readers whether they think it is appropriate for the government to monitor telephone records. Here is a selection of the responses, some of which have been edited:</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 13:45:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Your e-mails: The government and your phone records</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/11/feedback.phone.records/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/11/feedback.phone.records/index.html</guid><description>CNN.com asked users for their reaction to Thursday's USA Today report that the National Security Agency, with the cooperation of three telecommunication companies, has compiled a database of millions of domestic phone calls. Here is a sampling from the responses, some of which have been edited:</description><pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 00:09:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Transcript of Bush's comments on NSA phone monitoring</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/bush.transcript/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/bush.transcript/index.html</guid><description>President Bush on Thursday told Americans that their privacy "is fiercely protected" after a newspaper report that the National Security Agency compiled a database of  domestic phone records.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 16:06:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush says U.S. not 'trolling through personal lives'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/nsa.phonerecords/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/nsa.phonerecords/index.html</guid><description>President Bush said Thursday the government is "not mining or trolling through the personal lives of millions of innocent Americans" with a reported program to create a massive database of U.S. phone calls.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 15:30:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Reporter: NSA collects lists of numbers Americans call</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/cauley/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/11/cauley/index.html</guid><description>USA Today reported Thursday that the National Security Agency has been secretly collecting records of the phone calls of ordinary Americans.</description><pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 15:26:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush nominates Hayden as CIA chief</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/08/hayden/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/08/hayden/index.html</guid><description>President Bush on Monday nominated Air Force Gen. Michael Hayden to be the new CIA chief, setting up a possible battle with members of Congress who question whether his military status is right for the spy agency.</description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 10:47:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Lawmakers: CIA needs civilian leadership</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/07/hayden/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/05/07/hayden/index.html</guid><description>Lawmakers from both parties expressed concern Sunday that President Bush reportedly will nominate a longtime military officer to head the CIA.</description><pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 15:40:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>House group to oversee NSA eavesdropping</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/29/house.intel/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/29/house.intel/index.html</guid><description>The House Intelligence Committee has set up a special group to conduct oversight of the National Security Agency's eavesdropping program, a spokesman for the panel's chairman said Wednesday.</description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2006 18:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>GOP senators propose NSA spying bill</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/eavesdropping/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/03/07/eavesdropping/index.html</guid><description>Four Senate Republicans have proposed a bill to provide what one called "very rigorous oversight" of President Bush's controversial no-warrant domestic surveillance program while also giving it the force of law.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Terror operative seeks to rescind plea over NSA spying</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/01/nsa.challenge/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/01/nsa.challenge/index.html</guid><description>An Ohio truck driver and al Qaeda operative who pleaded guilty in 2003 to participating in a plot to blow up the Brooklyn Bridge wants to rescind that plea if the National Security Agency ever eavesdropped on him without a warrant.</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 21:23:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Senate plans no probe of NSA spy program </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/17/eavesdropping/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/17/eavesdropping/index.html</guid><description>For now, the Senate Intelligence Committee won't investigate the Bush administration's domestic surveillance program, its chairman said.</description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 13:13:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Poll: Fifth of Americans think calls have been monitored</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/14/poll.wiretaps/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/14/poll.wiretaps/index.html</guid><description>About a fifth of Americans think federal agents have listened in on their phone calls, a CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll released Tuesday suggests.</description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>A better way to eavesdrop? </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/07/eavesdropping.tm/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/07/eavesdropping.tm/index.html</guid><description>The Senate Judiciary Committee plans to hold a hearing Monday on the National Security Agency's controversial secret domestic spying program -- and already the Justice Department is balking at turning over its legal opinions justifying the electronic surveillance of Americans without a court warrant. But there's a bigger problem committee chairman Arlen Specter and the panel's other members face than simply getting Justice to cough up documents. Exactly how should the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which requires the Justice Department to obtain a warrant from a special FISA court before wiretapping anyone in the U.S., be updated to give the NSA more flexibility in spying on suspected terrorists?</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 19:04:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>In defense of eavesdropping</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/07/gonzales.nsa.tm/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/07/gonzales.nsa.tm/index.html</guid><description>Attorney General Alberto Gonzales sipped water, read from bread-box sized law books and generally kept his cool through a barrage of questions Monday as Senators from both parties tried to corner him on the limits of presidential wartime powers. It was the first real public debate in Congress since 9/11 about presidential authority in times of war, and so while the hearing was ostensibly about the President's secret warrantless wiretapping program, the most exercised debate was about how far the Commander in Chief's powers could be taken without judicial oversight.</description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 18:54:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Gonzales to face grilling on spy program</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/05/nsa.gonzales/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/05/nsa.gonzales/index.html</guid><description>U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is poised to defend President Bush's controversial domestic spying program Monday when he testifies at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the program.</description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:26:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Democrat: White House built 'wall' around spy program</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/02/threat.hearing/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/02/02/threat.hearing/index.html</guid><description>U.S. Sen. Jay Rockefeller on Thursday complained about a "wall the White House has constructed" around its domestic surveillance program and said Democrats will press their attacks on the president's authorization of the program.</description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:38:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>CNN Fact Check: State of the Union</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/31/sotu.factcheck/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/31/sotu.factcheck/index.html</guid><description>President Bush touched on many different areas in his State of the Union address Tuesday. Here is a CNN Fact Check of some of the statements he made:</description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Toobin, Ensor: Look for political solution on wiretaps</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/24/otsc.toobin.ensor/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/24/otsc.toobin.ensor/index.html</guid><description>The White House has begun a new push to justify a controversial domestic spying program that allows the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on conversations to or from the United States without obtaining a court warrant.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:18:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Gonzales defends wiretaps amid protest</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/24/nsa.strategy/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/24/nsa.strategy/index.html</guid><description>Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had trouble tapping into a group of hooded protesters at Georgetown Law School in Washington on Tuesday.</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>White House steps up defense of domestic eavesdropping</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/23/nsa.strategy/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/23/nsa.strategy/index.html</guid><description>President Bush and other officials Monday intensified their defense of a domestic surveillance program that supporters say protects against terrorism and critics say threatens civil liberties.</description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:30:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Justice Department offers legal basis for wiretaps</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/20/doj.nsawiretaps/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/20/doj.nsawiretaps/index.html</guid><description>The Justice Department has issued a detailed legal justification for President Bush's decision to order the National Security Agency's controversial domestic surveillance program.</description><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Two groups sue over NSA wiretap program</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/17/aclu.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/17/aclu.nsa/index.html</guid><description>Two lawsuits were filed Tuesday against the National Security Agency over its no-warrant wiretapping program, claiming the domestic eavesdropping is unconstitutional and that President Bush exceeded his authority by authorizing it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:34:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Gonzales defends NSA, rejects call for prosecutor</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/17/gonzales.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/17/gonzales.nsa/index.html</guid><description>Attorney General Alberto Gonzales once again Monday defended the legality of a controversial surveillance program by the National Security Agency, calling it a "very targeted and limited" operation that has helped thwart terrorist attacks in the United States.</description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:07:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Gore: Resist Bush's 'excessive power grab'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/16/gore.constitution/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/16/gore.constitution/index.html</guid><description>Former Vice President Al Gore called on Congress and the public to resist what he called "a gross and excessive power grab" by the Bush administration amid the war on terrorism, declaring that "our Constitution is at risk."</description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:40:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Gonzales to testify on domestic spying</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/13/nsa.congress/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/13/nsa.congress/index.html</guid><description>U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Friday that he will testify in a Senate hearing on the National Security Agency's recently revealed domestic eavesdropping program.</description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush on Iraq: 'We're doing the right thing'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/11/bush.kentucky/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/11/bush.kentucky/index.html</guid><description>President Bush on Wednesday defended the National Security Agency's controversial warrantless eavesdropping program and the nearly three-year mission to plant democracy in Iraq -- his second speech in as many days revolving around national security.</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>NSA: Amanpour, other CNN reporters not targeted for surveillance</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/06/nsa.amanpour/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/06/nsa.amanpour/index.html</guid><description>A senior U.S. intelligence official told CNN on Thursday that the National Security Agency did not target CNN's chief international correspondent Christiane Amanpour or any other CNN journalist for surveillance.</description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:09:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Cheney: NSA eavesdropping critical to U.S. security</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/04/cheney.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/04/cheney.nsa/index.html</guid><description>In a robust defense of the nation's post-9/11 domestic eavesdropping program, Vice President Dick Cheney on Wednesday said the tool is "critical" for U.S. national security.</description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The book behind the bombshell</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/03/bombshell.book.tm/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/03/bombshell.book.tm/index.html</guid><description>In the abstruse world of espionage, it's not always easy to know when you are in on a secret. So when intelligence sources approached New York Times reporter James Risen in late 2004 with evidence that the Bush Administration was running a covert domestic-spying program, Risen says he "wasn't sure what to believe." As Risen and Times colleague Eric Lichtblau looked into the story, more whistle-blowers came forward, convincing the reporters that the eavesdropping claims were credible. At that point Risen asked a few "very senior" government officials what they knew about the spying program. "They would look at me with these blank expressions, and say, 'No--that can't be going on,'" Risen told TIME. That's when Risen knew he was sitting on a major scoop.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 21:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush says, bring it on; the critics will</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/03/politicalfallout.tm/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/03/politicalfallout.tm/index.html</guid><description>Up until a couple of weeks ago, George W. Bush's script to put the misery of 2005 behind him had seemed destined for a smooth rollout. Buoyed by the apparent success of the Iraqi elections, the President would score a quick confirmation victory with Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, follow it up with a soaring State of the Union address and then return to full campaign mode with a sweep around the country, talking about big issues like immigration and Medicare and throwing the spotlight on a resurgent economy. But the revelation that his Administration has been spying in this country without warrants -- illegally, critics say --may have put a crimp in Bush's plan to climb back on top of the agenda as the new legislative session begins. "When Congress comes back," warns a top GOP congressional aide, "domestic surveillance and privacy issues will be all over the front pages."</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 20:59:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Has Bush gone too far?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/03/bush.nsa.tm/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/03/bush.nsa.tm/index.html</guid><description>In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, White House officials were haunted by two questions. Were there other terrorists lying in wait within the U.S.? And, given how freely the 19 hijackers had been able to operate before they acted, how would we know where to find them? It didn't take long before an aggressive idea emerged from the circle of Administration hawks. Liberalize the rules for domestic spying, they urged. Free the National Security Agency (NSA) to use its powerful listening technology to eavesdrop on terrorist suspects on U.S. soil without having to seek a warrant for every phone number it tracked. But because of a 1978 law that forbids the NSA to conduct no-warrant surveillance inside the U.S., the new policy would require one of two steps. The first was to revise the law. The other was to ignore it.</description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush defends NSA spying program</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/01/nsa.spying/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/01/nsa.spying/index.html</guid><description>President Bush on Sunday defended his administration's use of wiretaps on U.S. citizens without a court order, saying comments he made in 2004 that "nothing has changed" in the use of wiretaps were not misleading.</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 22:44:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Inquiry into leak of NSA spying program launched</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/30/nsa.leak/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/30/nsa.leak/index.html</guid><description>The Justice Department has opened an investigation into leaks to the media about the National Security Agency's  classified  domestic surveillance program.</description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 15:39:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Lawyers: Did NSA snoop on suspects?</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/28/lawyers.spying/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/28/lawyers.spying/index.html</guid><description>Defense attorneys for several terror suspects prosecuted by the Justice Department said Wednesday they plan to file court motions questioning the legality of a National Security Agency surveillance project.</description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:52:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Report: Telecom companies aid in eavesdropping</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/24/nsa.surveillance/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/24/nsa.surveillance/index.html</guid><description>Telecommunications companies are helping the National Security Agency collect information as part of a program President Bush secretly approved in 2002, a source familiar with the program said.</description><pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:11:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Administration defends NSA eavesdropping to Congress</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/23/justice.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/23/justice.nsa/index.html</guid><description>Justice Department lawyers have sent a letter to key congressional leaders providing legal arguments they say justify President Bush's decision to authorize the National Security Agency to intercept communications between people in the United States and potential terrorist contacts abroad.</description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Spy court to get secret briefing -- about secrets</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/22/nsa.court/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/22/nsa.court/index.html</guid><description>A court that oversees government surveillance will receive a secret briefing about President Bush's controversial domestic spying program, a judge on the court told CNN.</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2005 17:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Democrats call for investigation of NSA wiretaps</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/18/bush.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/18/bush.nsa/index.html</guid><description>Democratic House leaders called Sunday for an independent panel to investigate the legality of a program President Bush authorized that allows warrantless wiretaps on U.S. citizens, according to a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert.</description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:22:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush says he signed NSA wiretap order</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/17/bush.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/12/17/bush.nsa/index.html</guid><description>In acknowledging the message was true, President Bush took aim at the messenger Saturday, saying that a newspaper jeopardized national security by revealing that he authorized wiretaps on U.S. citizens after September 11.</description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:25:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>N.Y. Times statement defends NSA reporting</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/16/nytimes.statement/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/12/16/nytimes.statement/index.html</guid><description>The following is a statement from New York Times executive editor Bill Keller on the paper's decision to print a story Friday that said President Bush secretly authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens and others in the United States who were communicating with individuals overseas.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:29:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Bush won't confirm report NSA spied on Americans</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/16/bush.nsa/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/12/16/bush.nsa/index.html</guid><description>Without confirming a report that he OK'd eavesdropping on U.S. citizens in 2002, President Bush defended his actions since September 11, 2001, saying he has done everything "within the law" to protect the American people.</description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:53:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Review: 'Forgotten' barely memorable</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/23/review.forgotten/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2004/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/23/review.forgotten/index.html</guid><description>"The Forgotten" is just clever enough to be a worthy showcase for the immense skills of one of America's most gifted actresses, Julianne Moore. From the moment she signs on, her presence automatically increases interest in any project while lifting the artistic stakes.</description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:06:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Hatching Plans</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fsb/fsb_archive/2004/02/01/360656/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fsb/fsb_archive/2004/02/01/360656/index.htm</guid><description>Incubators have given us so many good ideas--who can forget eToys?--that it only makes sense to entrust them with homeland defense. The brand-new Chesapeake Innovation Center in Annapolis, backed b...</description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>The Counterterror Arsenal What weapons and tactics will the U.S. bring to bear in this new war?</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2001/10/15/311503/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2001/10/15/311503/index.htm</guid><description>Military commanders need intelligence to pick targets and plan strikes, and U.S. leaders doubtless are wishing they had more of it right now. The reputation of the spooks at the Central Intelligenc...</description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2001 04:01:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>MARKET MOVERS THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF WALL STREET ANALYSTS CLAMORING FOR YOUR ATTENTION, BUT ONLY A HANDFUL CAN BE COUNTED ON TO M</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/10/27/233312/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/10/27/233312/index.htm</guid><description>My job is to make people money," declares Merrill Lynch's Tom Kurlak. It's a laudable goal, but a hard one to reach with any consistency. Critics have long complained that much of the analysis comi...</description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1997 05:01:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>WHEN CONGRESS SPEAKS, CONSULTANTS LISTEN PLENTY OF LOOT ALONG THE POTOMAC</title><link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/08/04/229701/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1997/08/04/229701/index.htm</guid><description>It has finally happened. Management of the federal government has gotten so bad, even the Washington bureaucrats have taken notice. Over the past few years, Congress has quietly passed a series of ...</description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 04:01:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>WHAT'S SO GREAT ABOUT ADMIRAL BOBBY INMAN? He has never earned a nickel of profit. But savvy financiers, impressed by his ideas </title><link>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1986/11/10/68258/index.htm</link><guid>http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1986/11/10/68258/index.htm</guid><description>ADMIRAL Bobby Ray Inman is on a mission to save the country, or at least its economic place in the world. Pretty grandiose, you say, if not cockeyed. So why are a dozen of the biggest names in Amer...</description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 1986 05:01:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>