<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Paul Clement: News &amp; Videos about Paul Clement - CNN.com</title><link>http://topics.cnn.com/topics/feeds/rss/Paul_Clement</link><description>Find stories, videos, and photos about Paul Clement from CNN.com.</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Cable News Network LP, LLLP.</copyright><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:01:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>5</ttl><item><title>Justices: Child porn is not protected speech</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/05/19/scotus.porn/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/05/19/scotus.porn/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Supreme Court on Monday upheld a law aimed at preventing child pornography, ruling a provision dealing with "pandering" illicit material does not violate constitutional protections on free speech.</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:18:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Supreme Court tackles 'Millionaires' Amendment'</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/22/scotus.millionaire/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/04/22/scotus.millionaire/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The Supreme Court on Tuesday debated whether a provision of federal election law that allows opponents of certain self-financed candidates to exceed campaign spending limits unfairly punishes those who self-finance.</description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:16:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Attorney general argues terror case before high court</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/25/scotus.mukasey/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/25/scotus.mukasey/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey argued before the Supreme Court on Tuesday to uphold the entire conviction of a terrorist implicated in the failed millennium bomb plot.</description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:39:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Justices Agree on Right to Own Guns</title><link>http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1723491,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</link><guid>http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1723491,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</guid><description>Americans have a right to own guns, Supreme Court justices declared Tuesday in a historic and lively debate that could lead to the most significant interpretation of the Second Amendment since its ratification two centuries ago</description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:40:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Attorney general plans rare appearance before high court</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/12/mukasey.scotus/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/03/12/mukasey.scotus/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>Attorney General Michael Mukasey will rely on his experience dealing with high-profile terrorism trials when he argues a case before the U.S. Supreme Court later this month.</description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:36:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Guantanamo Cases at Supreme Court
</title><link>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1691059,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</link><guid>http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1691059,00.html?xid=feed-cnn-topics</guid><description>The Bush administration is back at the Supreme Court to defend its indefinite detentions of foreign terrorism suspects at the US naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Some men have been held there nearly six years</description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 10:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Sources: Retired judge may replace Gonzales</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/15/gonzales.replacements/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/09/15/gonzales.replacements/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>A retired federal judge is a leading candidate to replace Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, whose last day on the job was Friday, two sources familiar with the search for a successor told CNN on Saturday.</description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:50:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Who will succeed Gonzales? The name-dropping game begins</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/27/gonzales.replacement/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/27/gonzales.replacement/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>It happens immediately after any high-level White House official resigns his or her post -- political observers and Washington reporters go into overdrive over possible replacements.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:58:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Snow: Congress creating 'controversies' over Gonzales</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/27/gonzales/index.html#cnnSTCText</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/27/gonzales/index.html#cnnSTCText</guid><description>The White House and Justice Department say what looks like a contradiction between testimony of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and FBI Director Robert Mueller is nothing more than a confusion of terms.</description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 07:08:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Court could toss key part of campaign finance law</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/04/25/scotus.campaign.ads/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/04/25/scotus.campaign.ads/index.html</guid><description>A majority of the Supreme Court's conservative bench appeared ready Wednesday to turn aside part of a sweeping campaign finance reform law with important implications for the upcoming presidential election</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:01:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>Justices hear intense arguments on abortion law </title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/11/08/scotus.abortion/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/11/08/scotus.abortion/index.html</guid><description>The graphic details of a disputed abortion procedure filled the Supreme Court on Wednesday as justices voiced concern with a federal ban on that operation.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:06:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>All eyes on Roberts court as it takes on abortion</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/11/06/scotus.abortion/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/11/06/scotus.abortion/index.html</guid><description>The morning after the closely fought midterm elections, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear its first major abortion case in six years.</description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:46:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Court hears challenge to tribunals</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/28/scotus.tribunal/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/03/28/scotus.tribunal/index.html</guid><description>The Supreme Court  heard arguments Tuesday in what could prove a landmark case on the president's power in a wartime setting.</description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:55:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>U.S.: Dismiss bin Laden driver's appeal</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/12/scotus.gitmo/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/01/12/scotus.gitmo/index.html</guid><description>The Justice Department on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to dismiss an appeal by a terror suspect being held at Guantanamo Bay.</description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:21:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Appeals court hears accused 'dirty bomb' case</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/19/padilla/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/19/padilla/index.html</guid><description>The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments Tuesday on whether the Bush administration has the authority to hold accused "dirty bomb" suspect Jose Padilla indefinitely until the war on terrorism ends.</description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:53:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>The Texas State Capitol's Ten Commandments at the Supreme Court</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/10/hamilton.ten.commandments/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/10/hamilton.ten.commandments/index.html</guid><description>Last week, the Supreme Court heard oral argument on two Ten Commandments cases.</description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:58:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Justice asks Supreme Court for early hearing on federal sentencing</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/22/federal.sentencing/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/22/federal.sentencing/index.html</guid><description>Declaring "disarray" in federal sentencing, Justice Department lawyers late Wednesday asked the Supreme Court to hold a special session and issue a prompt ruling on whether federal sentencing guidelines are unconstitutional.</description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 15:24:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>High court hears 'enemy combatant' cases</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/28/enemy.combatants/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/28/enemy.combatants/index.html</guid><description>Government lawyers told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that the president has the legal authority to detain and interrogate suspected terrorists indefinitely without charging them regardless of whether they are arrested overseas or in the United States.</description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:28:00 EDT</pubDate></item><item><title>'Dirty bomb' suspect gets conditional lawyer access</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/11/padilla.attorney.access/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/02/11/padilla.attorney.access/index.html</guid><description>The Defense Department announced Wednesday it has decided to grant "dirty bomb" suspect Jose Padilla access to a lawyer "subject to appropriate security restrictions."</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:42:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Justices rule for federal government in clean air case</title><link>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/21/scotus.cleanair.ruling/index.html</link><guid>http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/01/21/scotus.cleanair.ruling/index.html</guid><description>Setting limits on states rights, the Supreme Court Wednesday gave the federal government the power to impose more expensive pollution controls than Alaska wanted regarding power generation at an Alaskan mine.</description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:53:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>